Aim. This study focuses on analyzing various approaches to transporting captured carbon dioxide (СО₂) to storage sites. Methods. The study examines four transportation methods for moving СО₂ to storage sites: pipeline, water, rail, and road systems. Results. Our analysis revealed the unique characteristics of transporting captured СО₂ in various phase states. We determined the quality characteristics of СО₂ affecting the durability of the materials used in transportation containers and systems. Additionally, we analyzed the features of existing pipelines specifically designed for СО₂ transportation. that the findings suggest that when designing carbon pipelines, it is essential to consider the physical, environmental, and social factors of the area where the pipeline will be located. Conclusion. The analysis of methods for transporting captured СО₂ to storage sites indicates that pipeline and water transport systems are currently the most viable options. Transporting СО₂ by water shares several similarities with the transportation of liquefied petroleum gas. Conversely, rail and road СО₂ transportation tend to be more expensive compared to pipeline and water options and may be appropriate for smaller, geographically distributed emission point sources where temporary storage in containers is feasible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rasul Akhtyamov (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: