Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Erving Goffman's most profound and theoretically dense work, Frame Analysis, first published in 1974, is now fifty years old: an iconic linkage of the micro and macro‐level. In this reassessment after half a century, I connect Goffman's phenomenological analysis with the meso‐level study of groups and meaning within tiny publics. Frames are inevitably connected with local cultures. In making this claim, I draw upon group‐based conventions of the proper use of profanity, the dynamics of in‐group joking, and the workings of deceptive teamwork. I conclude that there is no single set of frames, keys, and laminations, but all are based within communities of action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gary Alan Fine (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: