This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Abstract Objective: To describe the demographic factors and clinical characteristics associated with the utilization of an eye emergency room resulting in glaucoma care referral. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Subjects: All patients seen at the Wills Eye Emergency Room (ER) from October 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021, who were referred for glaucoma care. Methods and Measures: Demographic data were collected. Blindness in one or both eyes was defined as BCVA ≤20/200.¹ Results: 7438 patients presented to the ER during the study period, and 192 (2.6%) were referred for glaucoma care. Of the 108 patients who provided ophthalmic history, 76 (70.4%) patients (40.8% unilaterally blind and 5.3% bilaterally blind) received a new diagnosis of definite or suspected glaucoma in the ER. 43 of 192 (22.4%) patients required urgent glaucoma procedural intervention after the ER visit; 28 (65.1%) were given a new diagnosis of definite or suspected glaucoma in the ER. 31 of 192 (16.2%) patients were uninsured; they were more likely to be younger in age (54.4 ± 14.5 years vs. 61.8 ± 15.7 years; P=0.016) and to speak a primary language other than English (16.1% vs. 5.6%; P=0.042) as compared to insured patients. Conclusion: Over a 6-month period, glaucoma represented a small subset of ER visits but resulted in a new diagnosis of definite or suspected glaucoma in the majority of cases, of whom 46.1% were unilaterally or bilaterally blind. Almost two-thirds of those with a new diagnosis required an urgent glaucoma procedural intervention after the ER visit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shukla et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: