As a Special Interest Group, we frame design ethics as an invitation to care and argue against reducing it to a methodology, framework, checklist, toolkit, or an afterthought. This broad framing highlights that ‘ethics’ can carry multiple meanings in different contexts and can be approached from various theoretical perspectives. Consequently, this track addresses the need for a nuanced and reflexive discussion on how ethics and design are intertwined. Our track attracted 44 submissions, 17 of which have been accepted through a double-blind peer-review process. We clustered these submissions according to the three main themes in our track title: Ethics in / of / for Design. Most of the submissions help address the question: How to nurture ethical awareness and accountability in design practices? Together, these submissions stimu- late looking back with critical historical awareness, while also looking forward with cautious optimism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ozkaramanli et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: