This article attempts to answer two current calls in applied linguistics, including a specific call for more methodological investment in narrative inquiry (Barkhuizen & Consoli, 2021) and a general call for methodological innovation in all areas of applied linguistics (Li et al., 2023; Li & Prior, 2022). This article proposes zine-making as a fun, creative, ethical, and empowering data collection method in narrative inquiry (NI) in applied linguistics. Following a literature review of NI, zines and zine-making, I delineate the theoretical links between zine-making and NI in applied linguistics. I then demonstrate how zine-making was used to elicit individuals' life stories by reflecting on my experiences. An illustration of a sample of the findings from the zine-making data in NI is presented, along with a discussion of the strengths and limitations of zine-making from participants' perspectives. The article concludes with implications of zine-making as a methodological innovation in NI. Readers of this article will understand the basics of using zine-making for data collection in NI while being aware of and prepared for its limitations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meifang Zhuo (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: