BACKGROUND High-grade gliomas (HGG) arise in any CNS location with a poor prognosis. HGGs in teenagers/young adults (TYA) are understudied; this project aimed to characterise these tumours and identify therapeutic targets. METHODS HGG samples (histone/IDH-wildtype, n=207, FFPE/FF, 13-30 years) were collected from national/international collaborators. DNA methylation profiling (Illumina EPIC BeadArrays, brain tumour classifier (MNPv12.5 R package)) classified cases against reference cohorts. Calibrated scores guided workflows to characterise mutational landscapes (RNA-based ArcherDx fusion panel (n=92), whole exome sequencing (n=107), histological review). RESULTS Of cases scoring >0.5, n=25 classified as PXA and n=8 as HGAP, differing from primary diagnoses. 53.4% (n=86) classified as paediatric-type subgroups ((pedHGG-RTK1A/B/C, 31.7%, n=51, associated with frequent PDGFRA, CDKN2A/B, SETD2, NF1 alterations), pedHGG-MYCN (8.1%, n=13, MYCN/ID2 amplifications), and pedHGG-RTK2A/B (7.5%, n=12)). 18.0% (n=29) classified as subgroups frequently seen in adults including GBM-MES (15.5%, n=25, enriched for RB1, PTEN, NF1 alterations) and GBM-RTK1/2 (2.5%, n=4, CDK4 amplifications). 16 cases were assigned to novel, poorly-characterised subgroups with distinct methylation profiles and molecular features including paediatric-specific pedHGG-A/B (n=10 6.2%) and HGG-E (n=6 3.7%) subgroups, and HGG-B (n=2 1.0%), and GBM-CBM (n=5 3.1%, frequent cerebellar location) subgroups, associated with variable histological morphology. 8 cases showed hypermutator phenotypes, enriched in HGG-E. Age-distribution/molecular profile comparisons using publicly available methylation and sequencing data for HGG-B (n=9), GBM-CBM (n=26) and GBM-MES-ATYP (n=53), irrespective of age, shows they are TYA-specific subgroups with the latter containing fewer chr7 gains and chr10 losses, and more CDKN2A/B deletions and MET amplifications, compared with adult-specific GBM-MES-TYP. Across the cohort, other frequent copy number changes included gains in chr1q (54%, frequent in pedHGG-RTK1B/C/MYCN, pedHGG-A/B), chr2 (22%, pedHGG-MYCN), and chr13 losses (64%, pedHGG-RTK1B/C). Focal amplifications included CDK6 (1.4%, n=3) and EGFR (1.0%, n=2). CONCLUSION TYA HGG comprise well-characterised, novel methylation subgroups with distinct methylation profiles and molecular characteristics, representing opportunities to refine treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pereira et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: