Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper argues against the claim by Chinese government officials and some scholars that China's carbon emission trading scheme is market-driven. It finds that, in contrast to carbon markets that are characteristic of the marketization model, China's carbon markets are led by the state, and the market mechanism plays a limited role at best. Consequently, China's carbon markets are overwhelmingly challenged by a number of factors. These include the low efficiency of resource allocation, questionable market fairness, rent-seeking, and corruption. This paper argues that the state-led mechanism is not conducive to China's green transition unless a market system is introduced.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haifeng Deng (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: