Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Biodiversity conservation in human‐inhabited landscapes is increasingly gaining attention due to the global decline of species. Understanding the impact of human activities on avian functional ecology is becoming increasingly important as habitats are transformed. We assessed the influence of habitat fragmentation on avian functional diversity (FD), focusing on metrics like functional richness (FRic), evenness (FEve) and divergence (FDiv). We calculated the FRic, FEve and FDiv across habitats using ‘fundiversity’ R package. We also calculated the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) and estimated land‐use cover of the study area from Landsat 8 images. We observed higher FD in minimally disturbed habitats, where among the habitats, woodland had high FD while human settlement had low. This supports the intermediate disturbance hypothesis, which suggests that moderate disturbance can increase species diversity. Our findings emphasise the pivotal role of fragmented habitats in shaping avian functional ecology, with environmental variables such as the EVI influencing diversity across habitats. Hence, we promote sustainable conservation connectivity, proper land management practices and conservation‐friendly agricultural practices for sustainable biodiversity conservation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kavana et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: