.Three decades ago, Karp, Vazirani, and Vazirani [Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 1990, pp. 352–358] defined the online matching problem and gave an optimal \(1-1/e ≈ 0.632\)-competitive algorithm. Fifteen years later, Mehta et al. [J. ACM, 54 (2007), pp. 22:1–22:19] introduced the first generalization called AdWords driven by online advertising and obtained the optimal \(1-1/e\) competitive ratio in the special case of small bids. It has been open ever since whether there is an algorithm for general bids better than the 0.5-competitive greedy algorithm. This paper presents a 0.5016-competitive algorithm for AdWords, answering this open question on the positive end. The algorithm builds on several ingredients, including a combination of the online primal dual framework and the configuration linear program of matching problems recently explored by Huang and Zhang [Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2020], a novel formulation of AdWords which we call the panorama view, and a generalization of the online correlated selection by Fahrbach et al. [Proceedings of the 61st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2020], which we call the panoramic online correlated selection.Keywordsonline matchingAdWords problemcompetitive ratioprimal dualonline correlated selectionMSC codes68W27
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: