In astronomy, we frequently face the decision problem: does this data contain a signal? Typically, a statistical approach is used, which requires a threshold. The choice of threshold presents a common challenge in settings where signals and noise must be delineated, but their distributions overlap. Gravitational-wave astronomy, which has gone from the first discovery to catalogs of hundreds of events in less than a decade, presents a fascinating case study. For signals from colliding compact objects, the field has evolved from a frequentist to a Bayesian methodology. However, the issue of choosing a threshold and validating noise contamination in a catalog persists. Confusion and debate often arise due to the misapplication of statistical concepts, the complicated nature of the detection statistics, and the inclusion of astrophysical background models. We introduce conformal prediction (<a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:mi>C</a:mi><a:mi>P</a:mi></a:mrow></a:math>), a framework developed in machine learning to provide distribution-free uncertainty quantification to point predictors. We show that <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mrow><c:mi>C</c:mi><c:mi>P</c:mi></c:mrow></c:math> can be viewed as an extension of the traditional statistical frameworks whereby thresholds are calibrated such that the uncertainty intervals are statistically rigorous and the error rate can be validated. Moreover, we discuss how <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mrow><e:mi>C</e:mi><e:mi>P</e:mi></e:mrow></e:math> offers a framework to optimally build a metapipeline combining the outputs from multiple independent searches. We introduce <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:mrow><g:mi>C</g:mi><g:mi>P</g:mi></g:mrow></g:math> with a toy cosmic-ray detector, which captures the salient features of most astrophysical search problems and allows us to demonstrate the features of <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mrow><i:mi>C</i:mi><i:mi>P</i:mi></i:mrow></i:math> in a simple context. We then apply the approach to a recent gravitational-wave mock data challenge using multiple search algorithms for compact binary coalescence signals in interferometric gravitational-wave data. Finally, we conclude with a discussion on the future potential of the method for gravitational-wave astronomy. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashton et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: