We present cosmological constraints using the abundance of weak-lensing shear-selected galaxy clusters in the Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) Subaru Strategic Program. The clusters are selected on the mass maps constructed using the three-year (Y3) weak-lensing data with an area of ≈500~deg², resulting in a sample size of $129$ clusters with high signal-to-noise ratios ν of ν≥4.7. Owing to the deep, wide-field, and uniform imaging of the HSC survey, this is by far the largest sample of shear-selected clusters, in which the selection solely depends on gravity and is free from any assumptions about the dynamical state. Informed by the optical counterparts, the shear-selected clusters span a redshift range of z0.7 with a median of z≈0.3. The lensing sources are securely selected at z0.7 with a median of z≈1.3, leading to nearly zero cluster member contamination. We carefully account for (1) the bias in the photometric redshift of sources, (2) the bias and scatter in the weak-lensing mass using a simulation-based calibration, and (3) the measurement uncertainty that is directly estimated on the mass maps using an injection-based method developed in a companion paper (Chen et al. submitted). In a blind analysis, the fully marginalized posteriors of the cosmological parameters are obtained as Ωₘ = 0.50+0.28-0.24, σ₈ = 0.685+0.161-0.088, Ŝ₈≡σ₈(Ωₘ/0.3)0.25 = 0.835+0.041-0.044, and σ₈√Ωₘ/0.3 = 0.993+0.084-0.126 in a flat ΛCDM model. We compare our cosmological constraints with other studies, including those based on cluster abundances, galaxy-galaxy lensing and clustering, and Cosmic Microwave Background observed by $Planck$, and find good agreement at levels of 2σ. [abridged]
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: