Background: Anesthetic management for patients with significant cardiac disease is challenging and may be associated with high morbidity and mortality. Low-dose sequential combined spinal–epidural anesthesia [CSEA] is advantageous over single-shot spinal and epidural anesthesia as it provides rapid onset, efficacy, and minimal toxicity. Aim of the work: This study is planned to assess the safety of small-dose sequential CSEA in high-risk cardiac patients undergoing lower body surgeries and to estimate changes in hemodynamics, vasopressor use, surgeon satisfaction, and patient satisfaction.Patients and Methods: Sixty adult cardiac patients [5 with pulmonary hypertension, systolic pulmonary artery pressure > 50 mmHg] and fifty-five with low systolic function [ejection fraction < 40%] planned for a lower body procedure were included in our study. The CSEA technique was done with patients receiving spinal anesthesia with 5 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 20 μg fentanyl, followed by an epidural top-up of 5 ml 0.25% isobaric bupivacaine. Hemodynamic parameters and block characteristics were recorded.Results: There were no differences in the demographic data of the patients. No significant hemodynamic changes occurred during the procedure; hypotension happened in 5% of patients and bradycardia in less than 2% of patients. There were no arrhythmias or post-operative ECG changes, and postoperative troponin was negative. There was no postoperative nausea or vomiting.Conclusion: We conclude that low-dose sequential CSEA is a secure and efficacious method for patients with significant cardiac disease scheduled for lower body procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdelazeem et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: