This paper focuses on the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of university teachers under the appointment system. By analyzing the existing issues in the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of university teachers under the appointment system, several considerations regarding the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of university teachers are proposed. Currently, there are problems such as insufficient attention to the protection of university teachers' rights in China, slow updates of laws, and insufficient coordination among relevant parties. There are shortcomings in the protection of university teachers' rights by universities, educational administrative authorities, social organizations, and judicial organs. Drawing lessons from advanced practices in other countries and regions, this article proposes several suggestions based on the current situation in China, focusing on the legal relationship between universities and teachers, legal status, position allocation, teacher initiative, and teacher appointment procedures. These suggestions aim to explore feasible solutions for improving the system of protecting the rights and interests of university teachers under the appointment system while maximizing the protection of teachers' rights.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: