PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 8, 2025Frontiers in Nutrition2 citationsOpen Access

Association between Prognostic Nutritional Index and myelosuppression in gastric cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study

View Full Paper
KCKe ChenLXLifang XiaoBXBing Xiao

Key Points

  • Myelosuppression occurred in 75.1% of gastric cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
  • Each one-unit increase in prognostic nutritional index reduced the risk of myelosuppression by 13%.
  • Patients with prognostic nutritional index ≤ 48 had a substantially higher risk of myelosuppression.
  • Stronger protective effects of prognostic nutritional index were observed in male patients.

Abstract

Objective To investigate the association between Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in gastric cancer patients. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed 562 gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy at two Chinese medical centers from January 2022 to December 2024. The exposure variable was PNI, calculated from serum albumin and lymphocyte count. The primary outcome was myelosuppression after the first chemotherapy cycle, defined according to CTCAE 5.0 criteria. Multiple logistic regression models adjusted for demographics, health status, tumor characteristics, treatment factors, and laboratory parameters. Results Myelosuppression occurred in 75.1% of patients. After full adjustment, each one-unit increase in PNI reduced myelosuppression risk by 13% (OR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.79–0.96, p = 0.004). Patients with PNI ≤ 48 had a significantly higher risk of myelosuppression (OR = 14.50, 95%CI: 4.93–42.65, p 0.001). Significant effect modification was observed by sex (interaction p 0.001), with stronger protective effects in males (OR = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.60–0.84). Conclusion PNI is an independent predictor of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in gastric cancer patients, with a threshold of ≤48 identifying high-risk individuals. This readily available biomarker may guide personalized preventive strategies, particularly for male patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6494525bc5bdb98713a39https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1605421
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper