Systematic review evaluates efficacy and safety of ADC therapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, showing promising outcome metrics while highlighting adverse events.
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are revolutionizing the treatment landscape of advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). We systematically reviewed the PubMed and Embase databases for published clinical trials evaluating ADC-combination regimens in aUC. We extracted safety and efficacy outcomes, including objective-response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), and ≥ grade 3 AEs. We excluded narrative reviews, retrospective studies, and case reports. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts for relevance, followed by a full-text review for eligibility. A total of 645 patients from 5 trials investigating anti-nectin-4 (enfortumab vedotin, EV), anti-TROP2 (sacituzumab govitecan, SG), and anti-HER2 (disitamab vedotin, DV) ADCs were identified. We recorded a pooled ORR of 65%. We recorded a pooled risk rate for all-grade toxicity of 57%. The most prevalent any-grade AEs were peripheral sensory neuropathy 52% (95% CI, 45%-59%), fatigue 45% (95% CI, 28%-64%), and diarrhea 42% (95% CI, 16%-74%). Peripheral sensory neuropathy, fatigue, and alopecia were more commonly observed in anti-nectin-4 regimens. Gastrointestinal (diarrhea and nausea) and hematologic (anemia and neutropenia) toxicities were more commonly observed in anti-TROP2 regimens. Hepatotoxicity was predominantly found in anti-HER2 regimens. While ADC-based combination regimens show promising responses, they also have high rates of AEs in patients with aUC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaime‐Casas et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: