First-generation college students face greater life adversity and demonstrate higher internalized distress versus their continuing-generation peers. In 598 undergraduate students, this study tests: links between life adversity and internalized distress, moderation by trait rumination, and whether effects differ for first-generation versus continuing-generation students. Four of six latent moderated structural equation models supported the hypothesis that trait rumination (the tendency to engage in negative, self-focused thought) moderates the effects of family and financial chronic stress to predict depression and anxiety. Effects were similar in first-generation and continuing-generation students. Implications include offering trait rumination interventions especially to those with high chronic stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vrshek‐Schallhorn et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: