Measurements of the <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><a:msub><a:mi>p</a:mi><a:mi mathvariant="normal">T</a:mi></a:msub></a:math>-dependent flow vector fluctuations in Pb–Pb collisions at <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><c:mrow><c:msqrt><c:msub><c:mi>s</c:mi><c:mi>NN</c:mi></c:msub></c:msqrt><c:mo>=</c:mo><c:mn>5.02</c:mn><c:mspace width="0.16em"/><c:mi>TeV</c:mi></c:mrow></c:math> using azimuthal correlations with the ALICE experiment at the Large Hadron Collider are presented. A four-particle correlation approach [ALICE Collaboration, ] is used to quantify the effects of flow angle and magnitude fluctuations separately. This paper extends previous studies to additional centrality intervals and provides measurements of the <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><e:msub><e:mi>p</e:mi><e:mi mathvariant="normal">T</e:mi></e:msub></e:math>-dependent flow vector fluctuations at <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><g:mrow><g:msqrt><g:msub><g:mi>s</g:mi><g:mi>NN</g:mi></g:msub></g:msqrt><g:mo>=</g:mo><g:mn>5.02</g:mn><g:mspace width="0.16em"/><g:mi>TeV</g:mi></g:mrow></g:math> with two-particle correlations. Significant <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><i:msub><i:mi>p</i:mi><i:mi mathvariant="normal">T</i:mi></i:msub></i:math>-dependent fluctuations of the <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><k:msub><k:mover accent="true"><k:mi>V</k:mi><k:mo>⃗</k:mo></k:mover><k:mn>2</k:mn></k:msub></k:math> flow vector in Pb–Pb collisions are found across different centrality ranges, with the largest fluctuations of up to <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:mrow><m:mo>∼</m:mo><m:mn>15</m:mn><m:mo>%</m:mo></m:mrow></m:math> being present in the 5% most central collisions. In parallel, no evidence of significant <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><n:msub><n:mi>p</n:mi><n:mi mathvariant="normal">T</n:mi></n:msub></n:math>-dependent fluctuations of <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><p:msub><p:mover accent="true"><p:mi>V</p:mi><p:mo>⃗</p:mo></p:mover><p:mn>3</p:mn></p:msub></p:math> or <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><r:msub><r:mover accent="true"><r:mi>V</r:mi><r:mo>⃗</r:mo></r:mover><r:mn>4</r:mn></r:msub></r:math> is found. Additionally, evidence of flow angle and magnitude fluctuations is observed with more than <t:math xmlns:t="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><t:mrow><t:mn>5</t:mn><t:mi>σ</t:mi></t:mrow></t:math> significance in central collisions. These observations in <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><u:mtext>Pb–Pb</u:mtext></u:math> collisions indicate where the classical picture of hydrodynamic modeling with a common symmetry plane breaks down. This has implications for hard probes at high <v:math xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><v:msub><v:mi>p</v:mi><v:mi mathvariant="normal">T</v:mi></v:msub></v:math>, which might be biased by <x:math xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><x:msub><x:mi>p</x:mi><x:mi mathvariant="normal">T</x:mi></x:msub></x:math>-dependent flow angle fluctuations of at least 23% in central collisions. Given the presented results, existing theoretical models should be reexamined to improve our understanding of initial conditions, quark–gluon plasma properties, and the dynamic evolution of the created system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acharya et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: