Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aims: this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) – based educational program in promoting physical activity (PA) behavior in Chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients. Methods: the Reasoned Action Theory-based Back Care program was a randomized controlled trial conducted at a Health Service Center. It compared the TRA construct’s effectiveness against a control group. Eighty patients referred to Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran were randomly assigned to either the TRA-based intervention group (n=40) or the control group (n=40). Both groups completed self-reported questionnaires at baseline, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups. Additionally, a checklist was used to assess lumbar spine range of motion test skills using the modified Schober test. Results: a significant interaction effect was observed between “group” and “test time” factors (p<0.001). A total of 77 cLBP patients were evaluated, with a mean age of 41.0±4.2 years in the intervention group and 39.0±3.5 years in the control group. While both groups initially aligned with TRA constructs (p>0.05), the intervention group demonstrated significant improvements in PA-related behavior at both 3-month (p <0.001) and 6-month (p><0.001) follow-ups. The mean score for PA behavior in the intervention group (8.4 ± 1.1) was significantly higher compared to the control group (3.2±1.0) (p><0.001). Similarly, pain intensity was significantly lower in the intervention group (3.8±2.2) compared to the control group (4.3±3.0) (p><0.001). Furthermore, the intervention group showed a significant improvement in lumbar spine range of motion test skills (p><0.05). The lumbar spine range of motion test skills of the intervention group significantly decreased (p><0.05). Conclusions: the TRA-BAC program demonstrates promise in improving PA-related behavior and reducing pain in cLBP patients through targeted educational strategies based on the TRA framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Delshad et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: