A challenging task in solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) is seeking for an alternative electrolyte, enabling high ionic conduction at relatively low operating temperatures, i.e., 300–600 °C. Proton‐conducting candidates, in particular, hold a significant promise due to their low transport activation energy to deliver protons. Here, a unique hierarchical TiO 2 ‐SrTiO 3 @TiO 2 structure is developed inside an intercalated TiO 2 ‐SrTiO 3 core as “yolk” decorating densely packed flake TiO 2 as shell, creating plentiful nano‐heterointerfaces with a continuous TiO 2 and SrTiO 3 “in‐house” interfaces, as well the interfaces between TiO 2 ‐SrTiO 3 yolk and TiO 2 shell. It exhibits a reduced activation energy, down to 0.225 eV, and an unexpectedly high proton conductivity at low temperature, e.g., 0.084 S cm −1 at 550 °C, confirmed by experimentally H/D isotope method and proton‐filtrating membrane measurement. Raman mapping technique identifies the presence of hydrogenated HO─Sr bonds, providing further evidence for proton conduction. And its interfacial conduction is comparatively analyzed with a directly‐mixing TiO 2 ‐SrTiO 3 composite electrolyte. Consequently, a single fuel cell based on the TiO 2 ‐SrTiO 3 @TiO 2 heterogeneous electrolyte delivers a good peak power density of 799.7 mW cm −2 at 550 °C. These findings highlight a dexterous nano‐heterointerface design strategy of highly proton‐conductive electrolytes at reduced operating temperatures for SOFC technology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Du et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: