Drawing on Fredric Jameson's and Monika Kaup's work, this article analyzes some aspects of utopian and dystopian thinking about religion in contemporary science fiction, taking as an example Ada Palmer's Terra Ignota series (2016–2021). In these novels set in the twenty-fifth century, religion is restricted to individual counseling with so-called 'sensayers', a future equivalent of scholars-of-religion-cum-spiritual-advisors. In exploring these visions of future religion, utopia and dystopia prove to be important concepts. Centering religion's ambivalence as both a centripetal and centrifugal societal force, Palmer presents a continuum of utopian, dystopian, anti-utopian, and anti–anti-utopian religion(s). Nevertheless, in Terra Ignota religion remains conceptualized as an anthropological necessity, limiting the radical difference of her unknown world. In conclusion, drawing on Gayle Salamon and Richard M. Zaner, I argue that speculative fiction's 'acts of possibilizing' can be generative of theoretical insight, providing occasion for fertilizing our 'ability to fantasy'.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adrian Hermann (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: