In this paper, we study the Ricker model xn+1=xnexp[rn(1−xn)],n=0,1,2…,(∗)where x0≥0, and {rn}n=0∞ is a sequence of positive ω-periodic numbers. We obtain sufficient conditions for equation (*) to have at least two non-constant periodic solutions by transforming the existence problem of non-constant ω-periodic solutions of (*) into the existence problem of positive fixed points except 1 of some function. For the special case of period-two parameters, we show that (∗) has at most two non-constant 2-periodic solutions, and give necessary and sufficient conditions for (*) to have no non-constant 2-periodic solutions, to have a unique non-constant 2-periodic solution which or the equilibrium 1 is semi-stable, and to have exactly two non-constant 2-periodic solutions, respectively. Finally, some specific examples are also provided to illustrate our theoretical results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: