According to classical Christology, Christ’s human will was always in conformity with and never contrary to the divine will. Call this notion ‘volitional non-contrariety’ ( VNC ). But theologians disagree over how to explain VNC . In this article, I consider four models of VNC : the Parameter Model, the Beatific Vision Model, the Molinist Model, and the Causal Model. I argue that the Causal Model, coupled with a compatibilist account of freedom, is the best way to understand VNC because libertarian accounts of Christ’s human freedom inevitably fail to preserve some other element of classical Christology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Randall K. Johnson (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: