The LuTan satellite is the first formation-flying mission of China enabling synthetic aperture radar interferometry in the L-band. As a key mission requirement, the absolute position of each satellite must be determined with an accuracy of 5 cm in three dimensions (3D). To fulfill this demand, each satellite carries a Global Positioning System/Beidou Navigation Satellite System (GPS/BDS) dual-constellation Global Navigation Satellite System receiver that can simultaneously track the GPS L1 and L2 signals, the BDS-2 B1I and B3I signals (BD2), and the BDS-3 B1C and B2a signals (BD3). In this study, we assess the performances of precise orbit determination with different signals and their combinations. For that purpose, we produce a total of five sets of orbit solutions, i.e., GPS-based, BD2-based, BD3-based, GPS/BD2 combined, and GPS/BD3 combined solutions. To evaluate the orbit solutions, comparisons in the orbital overlaps and with the GPS-based orbit are adopted. The orbital overlap analysis shows that the GPS-based solution has the smallest root mean square (RMS) of overlap orbit differences than other single-constellation solutions with 3.7 mm in 3D. The BD2- and BD3-based orbits are suffered from large errors and the overlap RMS differences are 24.7 and 18.9 mm, respectively. Furthermore, all of the combined orbits (both 3.1 mm for the GPS/BD2 and GPS/BD3 combined orbits) based on the variance component estimation method can obtain improvement than GPS-based solutions. For orbit comparisons, the GPS-based solution is selected to serve as the reference. The RMS values of the orbit differences are 29.9 and 15.4 mm for the BD2- and BD3-based solutions, respectively. For the GPS/BD2 and GPS/BD3 combined solutions, the values are 4.1 and 4.8 mm. In general, the results agree with those obtained in the overlap analysis. These results indicate that the BD3-based orbit is superior to the BD2-based orbit, while both of them are inferior to the GPS-based orbit. We show that inaccurate ephemerides of the BDS satellites can partly explain the degraded performance of the BDS-derived orbits. Nevertheless, the orbits still fulfill the 5 cm accuracy demand and can be readily used for subsequent precise baseline determination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: