Art-viewing is a defining component of society and culture, in part because the experience involves a wide-range and nuanced configuration of emotional and cognitive responses. Precisely because of this complexity, however, questions of the actual nature, scope, and variety of art experience remain largely unanswered: what kinds of patterns do we exhibit, how do various components go together, and can these be distilled into some number of shared experiential outcomes? We introduce a preliminary, exploratory study based on 345 individuals’ unique experiences with artworks from three exhibitions. Experiences were assessed via 46 affective/cognitive items based on a recent model, with individuals reporting to what degree they felt each during their encounter. Network/latent profile analyses revealed five patterns, aligning to a Harmonious, Facile, Transformative, and two Negative outcomes. These largely supported model hypotheses, connected to specific appraisals, and could be found, although with varying probability, across individual viewers and artworks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miller et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: