Key message We analyzed stem growth responses of Douglas-fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) to severe drought in 2003/04 and 2018. The results showed high drought tolerance in sandy, loamy, and most silty soils, with limitations on clayey soils. This study indicates the susceptibility of Douglas-firs with shallow root systems to extreme drought and the importance of deep rooting for high drought resilience. Context Although Douglas-fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) is considered a more drought-tolerant substitute for Norway spruce ( Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in Europe, there is considerable uncertainty about the drought tolerance of Douglas-fir under climate change, specifically concerning soil properties. Aims This study aimed to assess the influence of soil texture, plant-available water capacity, and rooting characteristics on the interannual stem growth response of Douglas-fir when exposed to severe drought. Methods Along a soil texture gradient from sand to clay, we selected seven closely spaced sites at elevations of approximately 500 m a.s.l. in southern Germany. Mixed-effects models were used to analyze the effects of soil physical and rooting characteristics on growth response indices (resistance, recovery, resilience) related to the severe to extreme droughts in 2003/04 and 2018. Results Douglas-fir showed high drought tolerance in sandy, loamy, and most silty soils. However, the results suggest a higher drought stress risk on clayey soils, as well as at specific silty sites with shallow root systems. A higher effective rooting depth increased the resilience of Douglas-fir during the extreme drought in 2018. Conclusion Douglas-fir demonstrated its drought tolerance in most soil textures. In addition, this study supports the need for combined above- and below-ground investigations on factors influencing drought tolerance and the importance of rooting for drought resilience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spangenberg et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: