During the earlier stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous studies used bicycle count data to understand the pandemic’s impact on urban cycling. However, given the context and timeliness of such studies, correcting for periods of missing data and ensuring data accuracy were not always possible. In this paper, we examine the quality of bicycle count data, using Montreal as a case study, and propose methodological improvements. By employing a missing value imputation technique and excluding sensors potentially affected by exogenous factors, we hope to provide cities with a more precise assessment of cycling trends.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Young et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: