Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This is the nineteenth paper—and twentieth study--that follows the footsteps of nineteen studies that have tried to analyze the competitive profiles of U.S. consumer markets: Men’s Shaving Cream, Beer, Shampoo, Shredded/Grated Cheese, Refrigerated Orange Juice, Men’s Razor-Blades, Women’s Razor-Blades, Toothpaste, Canned Soup, Coffee, Potato Chips, Alkaline AA Battery, Facial Tissue, Toilet Paper, Paper Towel, Disposable Diapers, Sanitary Pads, Automatic-Dishwasher Detergent, and Hand-Dishwashing Detergent. Michael Porter associates high market share with cost leadership strategy, which is based on the idea of competing on a price that is lower than that of the competition.However, customer-perceived quality—not low cost—should be the underpinning of competitive strategy, because it is far more vital to long-term competitive position and profitability than any other factor. So, a superior alternative is to offer better quality vs. the competition.In most consumer markets, a business seeking market share leadership should try to serve the middle class by competing in the mid-price segment; and offering quality better than that of the competition: at a price somewhat higher to signify an image of quality, and to ensure that the strategy is both profitable and sustainable in the long run. The middle class is the socio-economic segment that represents about 40% of households in America.Quality, however, is a complex concept, consumers generally find difficult to understand. So, they often use relative price, and a brand’s reputation, as a symbol of quality.The U.S. Household Liquid Non-Disinfectant Cleaner market had retail sales of $381 million in 2008. It was by far the largest segment of the eleven-segment Household Cleaners market, which had 2008 retail sales of $1,747 million. We have focused our attention on the 24-40 Oz size because it was the most popular, constituting 46% sales of the former market.The Household Liquid Non-Disinfectant Cleaner market was highly competitive, with no dominant player. In 2008 it had 24 brands each with sales over $ 1 million.Using Hierarchical Cluster Analysis, we tested two hypotheses: (I) That the market leader is likely to compete in the mid-price segment, and that (II) Its unit price is likely to be higher than that of the nearest competition.For 2008--and 2007--the data supported both Hypothesis I and II, because the market leader, Formula 409, was a member of the mid-price segment, and its unit price was higher that of the runner-up, Fantastic, also a member of the same segment. We found that relative price was a strategic variable, as we have hypothesized.We also discovered four strategic groups in this market.A pattern is emerging in price-quality segmentation analysis. In thirteen studies—that exclude Men’s Razor-Blades, Women’s Razor-Blades, Coffee, Toilet Paper, Paper Towels, Disposable Diapers, and Sanitary Pads—the market leader was found to be a member of the mid-price segment, as we have hypothesized.Also, results in ten markets supported Hypothesis II.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Y. Datta (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: