Abstract Objectives/ Background The primary objective of this study is to histologically evaluate new bone formation in the time frame of 12 to 14 weeks as opposed to a generally considered 16 to 20 weeks after extraction of teeth with ridge preservation using DFDBA and T-PRF membrane and secondarily to evaluate the dimensional changes including ridge width and height at these healing points. (Clinical and biometric evaluation). Materials & method: The protocol of this study has been registered in clinical trial registry (Registration number: CTRI/2021/12/038608). With the present single arm longitudinal pilot investigation including nine patients, 6 males and 3 females aged 18 to 50 years (mean 28.25 ± 6.5) requiring teeth extraction and delayed implant placement were selected to receive atraumatic extraction followed by simultaneous ridge preservation using T-PRF and DFDBA with T-PRF as biologic membrane. Results: Baseline values concerning the investigated parameters were comparable at the stipulated healing outcome period. After 12 to 14 weeks, there was no significant difference observed in alveolar ridge dimension. DFDBA & T-PRF combination revealed significantly greater vital bone formation. Investigation revealed no residual graft particles. On confirmation of achieved bone density through CBCT analysis; all implants were successfully placed at 12 to 14 weeks. Conclusion: When practiced, alveolar ridge preservation using DFDBA & T-PRF combination favours reduction in time for biologic basis of bone healing thus facilitating early implant placement to improve patient centred outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oza et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: