Genome graphs offer a powerful alternative to linear reference genomes, as they provide a richer representation of a collection of genomes by emphasising the polymorphic regions. Despite their advantages, it is difficult to characterise the structural complexity of a genome graph and efficiently call variants using it. In our study, we developed a novel framework to visualise and quantify the structural complexity of genome graphs and optimised existing genome graph-based variant-calling workflows. We applied these techniques on two human pan-genome graphs constructed with the variants from the 1000 Genomes Project - the first augmenting only common variants and the second all the variants, including rare ones. We found that rare variants increased the variability of a genome graph by 10-fold but hypervariability by 50-fold. Our framework highlighted biologically significant and highly variable loci like HLA and DEFB and several novel variable regions. Benchmarking the optimised variant-calling workflow with the two genome graphs identified 9.83% more variants than the linear reference genome. Additionally, it showed that rare variants had minimal impact on variant-calling performance. Our methods are effective in identifying novel genomic loci and variants from genome graphs and revealing the underlying genomic complexity of the represented population or species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamaraj et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: