We consider string/M-theory reductions on a compact space <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>X</a:mi><a:mo>=</a:mo><a:msup><a:mi>X</a:mi><a:mi>loc</a:mi></a:msup><a:mo>∪</a:mo><a:msup><a:mi>X</a:mi><a:mo>∘</a:mo></a:msup></a:math>, where <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:msup><c:mi>X</c:mi><c:mi>loc</c:mi></c:msup></c:math> contains the singular locus and <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:msup><e:mi>X</e:mi><e:mo>∘</e:mo></e:msup></e:math> is its complement. For the resulting supergravity theories, we construct a suitable symmetry topological field theory (SymTFT) associated with the boundary <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:mo>∂</g:mo><g:msup><g:mi>X</g:mi><g:mi>loc</g:mi></g:msup><g:mo>∐</g:mo><g:mo>∂</g:mo><g:msup><g:mi>X</g:mi><g:mo>∘</g:mo></g:msup></g:math>. We propose that boundary conditions for different Bogomol’nyi-Prasad-Sommerfield branes wrapping the same boundary cycles must be correlated for the SymTFT to yield an absolute theory consistent with quantum gravity. Using heterotic/M-theory duality, this constraint can be translated into a field-theoretic statement, which restricts the global structure of <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mi>d</i:mi><i:mo>≥</i:mo><i:mn>7</i:mn></i:math>, <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:mi mathvariant="script">N</k:mi><k:mo>=</k:mo><k:mn>1</k:mn></k:math> supergravity theories to reproduce precisely the landscape of untwisted toroidal heterotic compactifications. Furthermore, for six-dimensional (2, 0) theories, we utilize a subtle interplay between gauged 0-, 2-, and 4-form symmetries to provide a bottom-up explanation of the correlated boundary conditions in K3 compactifications of type IIB. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gould et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: