In addition to hydrogen poisoning, efficient electron transfer between promoters and Ru particles plays a crucial role in enhancing the performance of Ru-based heterogeneous catalysts for ammonia synthesis. Traditionally, Ru-based catalysts containing surface promoters prepared via an impregnation method pay significant attention to the contact position between promoter and Ru particles. Previous studies have shown that a minimal amount of surface promoters significantly enhances the activity, but excessive promoters can encapsulate transition metals, reducing the catalytic activity. In this work, we identify a mechanism of bulk Cs promoter that differs from traditional surface cocatalysts. The ammonia synthesis activity of Ru/Cs0.68Ti1.83O4 with bulk Cs is seven times higher than that of Cs–Ru/TiO2 synthesized by the impregnation method. Low hydrogen poisoning is revealed by kinetics studies while using a bulk Cs promoter. High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) images confirm no distinct differences of the positions between Cs and Ru for the above catalysts, indicating that the positioning factor is not a key determinant influencing activity. X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) results demonstrate that bulk and surface Cs follow different electron transfer mechanisms in Ru-based catalysts. Density functional theory calculations support the XANES results by showing that the bulk Cs-containing support Cs0.68Ti1.83O4 gives the Ru particles additional electrons. This novel electron transfer mechanism provides new ideas for the design and development of cocatalysts in ammonia synthesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: