PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 10, 2024Indiana Law ReviewOpen Access

The Challenges of AI-Decision-Making in Government and Administrative Law: A Proposal for Regulatory Design

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

BSBenedict SheehyYNYee‐Fui Ng

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Article discusses AI decision-making risks in vulnerable populations, proposing regulatory innovations to improve outcomes.

Key Points

  • AI decision-making risks can lead to significant harm in vulnerable populations, indicating a need for better regulation.
  • The proposal includes a 'Golden Rule' default advocate for negative decisions to protect affected individuals.
  • Analysis involves case studies from Australia, illustrating the complexities of AI governance in administrative law contexts. Governmental struggle to address AI issues shows the urgent necessity for a monitoring body that ensures equitable outcomes.

Cite This Study

Sheehy et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e65674b6db6435875e5758https://doi.org/10.18060/28360
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Legal Challenges in Regulating Artificial Intelligence Use in Criminal Justice Systems2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2The Governance of Artificial Intelligence: Balancing Ethics, Law and Innovation2025
  3. 3Introduction to the Issue on Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector: Risks and Benefits of AI for Governments2024 · 11 citations
  4. 4The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Public Sector Decision- Making: Benefits, Challenges, and Policy Implications2025 · 15 citations
  5. 5Artificial Intelligence in Government: Why People Feel They Lose Control2025 · 1 citations