Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Smurfing in financial networks is a popular fraud technique in which fraudsters inject their illegal money into the legitimate financial system. This activity is performed within a short period of time, with recurring transactions and multiple intermediaries. A major problem of existing graph-based methods for detecting smurfing is that they fall short of retrieving accurate fraud patterns. Consequently, the result is numerous non-fraudulent patterns alongside a few fraud patterns, causing a high false-positive rate. To alleviate this problem, we propose SMoTeF, a framework that extends existing graph-based smurf detection methods by distinguishing fraudulent smurfing patterns from non-fraudulent ones, thus significantly reducing the false-positive ratio. The core of the approach is a novel algorithm based on computing maximum temporal flow within temporal order of events. In order to evaluate the approach, a framework for injecting various smurfing patterns is developed, and experimental results on three real-world datasets from different domains show that SMoTeF significantly improves on the effectiveness of the state-of-the-art baseline, with only marginal runtime overhead.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shadrooh et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: