This paper presents a comparison of methods for locating virtual objects in augmented reality. Mobile devices were used: IPad Pro with lidar and, on the other hand, smartphones with classical cameras to obtain photogrammetric structures. FARO laser scans were used as reference representations to compare the obtained structures. Spatial stability tests of the embedded objects were carried out using Vuforia and Immersal systems. The overall performance of these technologies are comparable, however, LiDAR offers greater accuracy compared to photogrammetry, thanks to more stable and accurate distance measurements. On the other hand, photogrammetry may be more accessible and attractive because it does not require any special sensors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skabek et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: