Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present the idea of "e-fold" cross-validation. The core idea is that e is chosen ’intelligently’ and individually for each experiment and dataset. This contrasts a static k chosen by gut feeling and past experiences on what k is ’typically’ good. Our goal for e-fold cross-validation is that e is as small as possible so as not to waste timeand energy and not to create unnecessary CO2 emissions but large enough to provide (near) optimal performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beel et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: