Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Image classification analysis demonstrates over 90% accuracy in identifying sylvatic mosquito vectors, suggesting convolutional neural networks can improve yellow fever surveillance.
Abstract Background Identifying mosquito vectors is crucial for controlling diseases. Automated identification studies using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) have been conducted for some urban mosquito vectors but not yet for sylvatic mosquito vectors that transmit the yellow fever and other arboviruses. Here, we evaluated the ability of the AlexNet CNN to identify four mosquito species: Aedes serratus, Aedes scapularis, Haemagogus leucocelaenus and Sabethes albiprivus and whether there is variation in AlexNet's ability to classify mosquitoes based on pictures of four different body regions. Methods The specimens were photographed using a cell phone connected to a stereoscope. Photographs were taken of the full-body, pronotum and lateral view of the thorax, which were pre-processed to train the AlexNet algorithm. The evaluation was based on the confusion matrix, the accuracy (10 pseudoreplicates) and the confidence interval for each experiment. Results Our study found that the AlexNet can accurately identify mosquito pictures of the genus Aedes, Sabethes and Haemagogus with over 90% accuracy. Furthermore, the algorithm performance did not change according to the body regions submitted. It is worth noting that the state of preservation of the mosquitoes, which were often damaged, may have affected the network's ability to differentiate between these species and thus accuracy rates could have been even higher. Conclusions Our results support the idea of applying CNNs for AI-driven identification of mosquito vectors of tropical diseases. This approach can potentially improve the surveillance of yellow fever vectors by health services and the population as well.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Araújo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: