Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The notion of Syncretism can be considered to be a novel movement in art even though it has a prior presence in history, it flourished visually and intellectually in this current era due to the cultural and cognitive circumstances that made it emerge as a solution and a result to the art of the twentieth century. In the twenties, There was an intellectual call in Europe that noted the appearance of an alienated ambience among classists, beholders and philosophers, it arose upon the concept of dehumanization of art and the continuous call for novelty, leaving the notion of heritage to be confined by a specific era and knowledge restrained in the theoretical fields, hence, the syncretic artists of the twenty-first century have revived those values by expressing the notion of actuality and contemporizing with combining the aesthetics of ancient and preceding styles with contemporary aesthetics, enabling historical cognition to be present in contemporary arts and classical taste to be rebirthed in this age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ربه et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: