BACKGROUND The literature around the safety of digital mental health interventions is growing. However, the user/patient perspective is still absent from it. Understanding the user/patient perspective can ensure that professionals address issues that are significant to users/patients and help direct future research in the field. OBJECTIVE This qualitative study aims to explore digital mental health interventions’ users’ experiences, views, concerns, and suggestions regarding the safety of digital mental health interventions. METHODS The inclusion and exclusion criteria were 18 years old or above, has previous experience using a digital mental health intervention (DMHI) and can speak and understand English without the need for a translator. Fifteen individual interviews were conducted. Deductive thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. RESULTS The analysis of the interview transcripts yielded four main themes: Safety Concerns: users’ concerns around the safety of DMHIs, Safety Assessment: assessing a DMHI’s safety from users’ perspectives, Experienced Risks: the risks experienced by DMHIs’ users, Experienced Mitigations: the risk mitigation methods experienced by DMHIs’ users, and Mitigation Suggestions: users' suggestions on how risks can be mitigated. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study led to seven recommendations on how the safety of digital mental health interventions can be improved. These recommendations arose from users' experiences and suggestions. If implemented, these recommendations can improve the safety of digital mental health interventions and enhance users’ experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taher et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: