Objective To determine whether combining cross‐linked (CL) collagen‐integrated xenogeneic bone blocks stabilized with the fixation of resorbable collagen membranes (CM) can enhance guided bone regeneration (GBR) in the overaugmented calvarial defect model. Materials and Methods Four circular defects with a diameter of 8 mm were prepared in the calvarium of 13 rabbits. Defects were randomly assigned to receive one of the following treatments: (i) non‐cross‐linked (NCL) porcine‐derived collagen‐embedded bone block covered by a CM without fixation (NCL + unfix group); (ii) NCL bone block covered by CM with fixation using bone‐tack (NCL + fix group); (iii) cross‐linked (CL) porcine‐derived collagen‐embedded bone block covered by CM without fixation (CL + unfix group); and (iv) CL bone block covered by CM with fixation using bone‐tack fixation (CL + fix group). The efficacy of GBR was assessed through histological and molecular analyses after 2 and 8 weeks. Results At 2 weeks, there were no significant differences in histologically measured areas of newly formed bone among the groups. At 8 weeks, however, the CL + fix group exhibited a larger area of new bone (5.08 ± 1.09 mm 2 , mean ± standard deviation) compared to the NCL + unfix (1.62 ± 0.42 mm 2 ; p < .0083), NCL + fix (3.97 ± 1.39 mm 2 ) and CL + unfix (2.55 ± 1.04 mm 2 ) groups. Additionally, the expression levels of tumour necrosis factor‐alpha, fibroblast growth factor‐2, vascular endothelial growth factor, osteocalcin and calcitonin receptor were significantly higher in the CL + fix group compared to the other three groups ( p < .0083). Conclusion Cross‐linked bone blocks stabilized with collagen membrane fixation can significantly enhance GBR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
An et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: