Defining teacher wellbeing is a complex task, and the relative importance of its components remain unclear. Employing a three-phase prototype analysis, we investigated whether there was an ideal representation of wellbeing at work according to Australian teachers; and if so, which components were considered more important than others. Phase 1 (n = 138) generated wellbeing features. Phase 2 (n = 438) identified central and peripheral components while Phase 3 (n = 418) confirmed recognition of central components in a cognitive task. Analysing linguistic units and measures of reliability, findings revealed a prototypical organisation of the teacher wellbeing at work concept with central components including feeling safe, supported, valued, and trusted, and achieving work/life balance. The results of this study may help inform schools and policy makers design interventions and develop policies to foster thriving educational environments for all teachers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: