Securities intermediaries such as sponsors, accounting firms, law firms and asset credit assessment agencies are important components of the capital market. In recent years, securities misrepresentation cases have occurred frequently, and securities intermediaries have been more or less identified as having certain faults and bearing corresponding civil liabilities. The judgment of some of these cases has caused a lot of disputes and discussions, which exposes the inadequacy of the law on the civil liability of securities intermediary agencies for false statements, which brings a lot of trouble to the securities market and judicial practice. This paper takes the civil liability system of securities intermediaries for false statements as the research object, adopts normative analysis method, case study method and comparative study method to sort out the legal system and judicial status quo of securities intermediaries for civil liability of false statements, finds and demonstrates the existing difficulties, and tries to put forward corresponding improvement paths.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yizhou Wang (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: