Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) poses a significant challenge as it lacks specific treatments and can occur due to various etiologies. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as a promising cell-based therapy for ARDS due to their immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and anti-fibrotic properties. Despite encouraging findings from preclinical studies, clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of MSCs in non-COVID-19 ARDS remains insufficient. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of three major databases (Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and PubMed) to identify original articles focusing on MSCs in non-COVID-19 ARDS. Subsequently, we employed the bibliometric package in R Studio to analyze and visualize bibliometric indicators derived from the retrieved articles. Results: Our analysis of 244 original studies revealed a notable trend in research on MSCs and non-COVID-19 ARDS. While the number of publications in this area saw an increase beginning in 2007, it exhibited a decline after 2019, with only 20 articles published in 2022. Notably, a significant proportion (131/244) of these studies originated from Chinese scholars. MSC derivatives emerged as a recent research focus due to their unique advantages as an alternative to MSCs. Specifically, umbilical cord/placental-derived MSCs have gained traction, surpassing the use of bone marrow-derived MSCs by 2022. The route of delivery is still mainly intravenous. Despite the potential advantages of the intratracheal route for lung-related diseases, the intravenous route remains the preferred mode of drug delivery. Conclusion: Research on non-COVID-19 ARDS deserves further attention and investments. Existing studies have primarily focused on MSC derivatives that have shown clinical efficacy. Furthermore, umbilical cord/placental-derived MSCs are expected to replace traditional bone marrow- derived MSCs in research. Intratracheal delivery, which offers advantages for treating pulmonary diseases, still requires extensive experiments to validate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: