Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We compare supervised super-resolution convolutional neural networks (CNNs) against generative adversarial networks (GANs)-based architectures in the ability to reconstruct turbulent flow fields. GANs demonstrated superior in-sample performance but faced challenges with out-of-sample flows. Incorporating a partially unsupervised adversarial training step with large eddy simulation inputs and dynamic upsampling selection improved GANs' out-of-sample robustness, capturing small-scale features and turbulence statistics better than standard supervised CNNs. The study recommends integrating discriminator-based training to enhance super-resolution CNNs' reconstruction capabilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nista et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: