Long range, multiqubit parity checks have applications in both quantum error correction and measurement-based entanglement generation. Such parity checks could be performed using qubit-state-dependent phase shifts on propagating pulses of light described by coherent states <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><a:mrow><a:mo>|</a:mo><a:mi>α</a:mi><a:mo>〉</a:mo></a:mrow></a:math> of the electromagnetic field. We consider “flying-cat” parity checks based on an entangling operation that is quantum nondemolition for Schrödinger's cat states <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><b:mrow><b:mrow><b:mo>|</b:mo><b:mi>α</b:mi><b:mo>〉</b:mo></b:mrow><b:mo>±</b:mo><b:mrow><b:mo>|</b:mo><b:mrow><b:mo>−</b:mo><b:mi>α</b:mi></b:mrow><b:mo>〉</b:mo></b:mrow></b:mrow></b:math>. This operation encodes parity information in the phase of maximally distinguishable coherent states <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><c:mrow><c:mo>|</c:mo><c:mrow><c:mo>±</c:mo><c:mi>α</c:mi></c:mrow><c:mo>〉</c:mo></c:mrow></c:math>, which can be read out using a phase-sensitive measurement of the electromagnetic field. In contrast to many implementations, where single-qubit errors and measurement errors can be treated as independent, photon loss during flying-cat parity checks introduces errors on physical qubits at a rate that is anticorrelated with the probability for measurement errors. We analyze this trade-off for three-qubit parity checks, which are a requirement for universal fault-tolerant quantum computing with the subsystem surface code. We further show how a six-qubit entangled “tetrahedron” state can be prepared using these three-qubit parity checks. The tetrahedron state can be used as a resource for controlled quantum teleportation of a two-qubit state or as a source of shared randomness with potential applications in three-party quantum key distribution. Finally, we provide conditions for performing high-quality flying-cat parity checks in a state-of-the-art circuit QED architecture, accounting for qubit decoherence, internal cavity losses, and finite-duration pulses, in addition to transmission losses. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McIntyre et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: