Abstract Background This study aimed to evaluate the 1-year mortality rate among older patients with COVID-19 discharged from hospital and to identify the risk factors associated with this outcome. Methods Using a COVID-19 dataset from the Korean National Health Insurance System, this study’s evaluation period spanned from October 8, 2020, to December 31, 2021. The primary outcome was the 1-year mortality rate following hospital discharge. A logistic regression model was employed for multivariable analysis to estimate the odds ratios for the outcomes, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze differences in 1-year survival rates. Results Of the 66,810 COVID-19 patients aged 60 years or older who were hospitalized during the study period, the in-hospital mortality rate was 4.8% (n = 3219). Among the survivors (n = 63,369), the 1-year mortality rate was 4.9% (n = 3093). Non-survivors, compared to survivors, were significantly older (79.2 ± 9.5 vs. 68.9 ± 7.8, P < .001) and exhibited a lower rate of COVID-19 vaccination (63.1% vs. 91.8%, P < .001). Additionally, non-survivors experienced a higher incidence of organ dysfunction, and a greater proportion required mechanical ventilation (14.6% vs. 1.0%, P < .001) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (4.0% vs. 0.1%, P < .001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified older age, male sex, immunosuppression, organ dysfunction, severity of illness, and corticosteroid use during hospitalization as factors associated with death within 1 year after hospital discharge. However, vaccination was found to have a long-term protective effect against mortality among COVID-19 survivors. Conclusions and Implications The 1-year mortality rate after hospital discharge for older COVID-19 patients was comparable to the in-hospital mortality rate for these patients in Korea. The long-term mortality rate among hospitalized older COVID-19 patients was influenced by demographic factors and the severity of illness experienced during hospitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: