X-ray and γ-ray irradiations are performed on Frontside Illuminated (FSI) 2D-planar and Backside Illuminated (BSI) 3D-stacked CMOS single photon avalanche diodes (SPADs). Different degradations are observed for nearly the same deposited Total Ionizing Dose (TID). 2D-SPADs are only slighty degraded, with a Dark Count Rate (DCR) which increases after 320 krad(SiO2) with X-rays, while the DCR spectrum after 300 krad(SiO 2 ) with γ-rays is spread towards high DCR (3 to 4 decade increase). As these SPADs are less sensitive to ionizing radiation effects, this suggests a strong domination of the displacement damage contribution of γ-rays due to secondary electrons induced by Compton scattering, leading to point defects inside the silicon bulk. A large DCR tail in the distribution is also observed with 3D-stacked SPAD pixels but the histogram peak is close to the one caused by X-rays. This suggests that 3D-stacked SPADs are more sensitive to ionizing radiation due to a larger Si/SiO 2 interface area that can be degraded and a designed electric field imposed by the BSI configuration that maximizes charge collections in the avalanche region. Activation energy measurements confirm this result, by comparing data with a 62-MeV proton irradiation. The DCR alteration dependence with the SPAD voltage during X-ray irradiations is also studied, with an increasing degradation with the SPAD bias. Then, the Random Telegraph Signal (RTS) behavior of the DCR is studied: while X-rays do not induced DCR fluctuations, different RTS characteristics are observed between the two technologies, suggesting a major role of point defects. Comparisons with proton irradiations and an annealing study strengthen this assumption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jouni et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: