When is IV identification agnostic about outcomes?

Many identification results in instrumental variables (IV) models have the property that identification holds with no restrictions on the joint distribution of potential outcomes or how these outcomes are correlated with selection behavior. This enables many IV models to allow for arbitrary heterogeneity in treatment effects and the possibility of selection on gains in the outcome variable. I call this type of identification result "outcome-agnostic", and provide a necessary and sufficient condition for counterfactual means or treatment effects to be identified in an outcome-agnostic manner, when the instruments and treatments have finite support. In addition to unifying many existing IV identification results, this characterization suggests a brute-force approach to revealing all restrictions on selection behavior that yield identification of treatment effect parameters. While computationally intensive, the approach uncovers even in simple settings new selection models that afford identification of interpretable causal parameters.