AI-based decision support tools have been used in a wide range of high-stakes settings. However, many of them have failed. Past literature in FAccT contributes important insights into how to detect and mitigate AI failures from a technical perspective. Recently, there are growing calls to understand AI failures as socio-technical and to support community-centered, grassroots-based mitigations to AI failures, in addition to top-down approaches. In this paper, we present AI Failure Cards, a novel method for both improving communities' understanding of AI failures and for eliciting their current practices and desired strategies for mitigation, with a goal to better support those efforts in the future. Through a series of workshops with unhoused individuals, frontline workers and service providers, as well as local policy advocates, we conducted an empirical investigation of our method in the context of a locally deployed predictive housing allocation algorithm. Our results suggest that the use of the method helped impacted communities better understand these AI failures. It also surfaced a wide range of existing grassroots practices and desired mitigation strategies. Finally, we discuss both the challenges and opportunities for supporting grassroots efforts in mitigating AI failures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: