Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 3, 2024Open Access

Supplementary Figure S4 from A Prospective Double-Blinded Comparison of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Conventional Histopathology for In Vivo Assessment in Oral Cancer

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

DZDaniella K. ZanoniMedical University of South CarolinaPFPaula Demétrio De Souza FrançaUniversity of Wisconsin–MadisonCVCristina ValeroUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Zanoni et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e66839b6db6435875f3ce8https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.25956329.v1
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Supplementary Figure S4 from A Prospective Double-Blinded Comparison of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Conventional Histopathology for In Vivo Assessment in Oral Cancer2024
  2. 2Supplementary Figure S8 from A Prospective Double-Blinded Comparison of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Conventional Histopathology for In Vivo Assessment in Oral Cancer2024
  3. 3Supplementary Figure S8 from A Prospective Double-Blinded Comparison of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Conventional Histopathology for In Vivo Assessment in Oral Cancer2024
  4. 4Supplementary Figure S7 from A Prospective Double-Blinded Comparison of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Conventional Histopathology for In Vivo Assessment in Oral Cancer2024
  5. 5Supplementary Figure S7 from A Prospective Double-Blinded Comparison of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Conventional Histopathology for In Vivo Assessment in Oral Cancer2024