Purpose Chewing duration can affect food particle size, gastric processing, and postprandial glycemia, but these effects have not been investigated with exercise. This study examined how the chewing duration of a food bar impacts glycemic and metabolic responses, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, psychological affect, and performance during endurance running. Methods This randomized, unblinded, crossover study had 15 males (35.2 ± 7.4 years, VO 2peak : 56.1 ± 5.2 ml/kg/min) attend three laboratory visits. Visit 1 required a VO 2peak test, 10 min familiarization run at 60% VO 2peak , and familiarization time-to-exhaustion (TTE) test (10 min at 90% VO 2peak , followed by TTE at 100% VO 2peak ). Visits 2 and 3 consisted of a 60 min run at 60% VO 2peak , followed by TTE testing. Participants were fed 45 g of a bar (180 kcal, 4 g fat, 33 g carbohydrate, 3 g protein, 1 g fiber) in 9 g servings 30 min before running, and 27 g of bar in 9 g servings at three timepoints during the 60 min run. Participants consumed the servings in 20 (20CHEW) or 40 (40CHEW) masticatory cycles, at 1 chew/second. Outcomes included blood glucose, substrate use, GI symptoms, perceived exertion (RPE), overall feeling, and TTE. Results Post-prandial blood glucose, GI symptoms, and RPE increased over time, but there were no significant between-condition or condition-by-time effects. TTE showed no significant between-condition effect (20CHEW: 288 ± 133 s; 40CHEW: 335 ± 299 s; p = 0.240). Overall feeling demonstrated a time-by-condition effect ( p = 0.006), suggesting possible better maintenance over time with 40CHEW. Conclusion Cumulatively, the results suggest that extended chewing minimally impacts physiology, perceptions, and performance during 60 min moderate-intensity running.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geaney et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: